<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe I think too much.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christykarpinski.com/blog/2009/05/maybe-i-think-too-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christykarpinski.com/blog/2009/05/maybe-i-think-too-much/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shea Naer</title>
		<link>http://www.christykarpinski.com/blog/2009/05/maybe-i-think-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Shea Naer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christykarpinski.com/blog/?p=443#comment-392</guid>
		<description>These are really worthwhile questions, and there are no easy answers. Although I have not read his book, I have enjoyed some of Gladwell&#039;s essays in the New Yorker.

As image-makers we try to navigate a certain visual / intuitive territory, and then because of certain requirements, we must explain the imagery via words. I think there are many artists who find this process a bit awkward, and lacking in &quot;flow&quot;.  On the other hand, expressing ourselves on a theme can offer it&#039;s own insights, and propel us to deeper work.

When I studied experimental theatre, our esteemed teacher would remind us that if we had a &quot;good idea&quot;, to toss it aside. If we paid more attention to the chance elements, and responded instinctually, then what resulted was a fresher performance.

As to the images you posted, they stand on their own.  Would their mystery be somehow diminished if they were accompanied by the &quot;blueprints&quot; or an artist statement?  Depends on the viewer, and a number of other factors.

Ah, this is all so complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are really worthwhile questions, and there are no easy answers. Although I have not read his book, I have enjoyed some of Gladwell&#8217;s essays in the New Yorker.</p>
<p>As image-makers we try to navigate a certain visual / intuitive territory, and then because of certain requirements, we must explain the imagery via words. I think there are many artists who find this process a bit awkward, and lacking in &#8220;flow&#8221;.  On the other hand, expressing ourselves on a theme can offer it&#8217;s own insights, and propel us to deeper work.</p>
<p>When I studied experimental theatre, our esteemed teacher would remind us that if we had a &#8220;good idea&#8221;, to toss it aside. If we paid more attention to the chance elements, and responded instinctually, then what resulted was a fresher performance.</p>
<p>As to the images you posted, they stand on their own.  Would their mystery be somehow diminished if they were accompanied by the &#8220;blueprints&#8221; or an artist statement?  Depends on the viewer, and a number of other factors.</p>
<p>Ah, this is all so complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

